Read Time: 4 minutes

I was catching up with a friend and colleague recently—perhaps the best startup marketing professional I know. He shared an anecdote from a recent board meeting where members questioned how he intended to differentiate their offering from dozens of products in the same or adjacent market space. We shared a knowing laugh, understanding that just as the best coach cannot create a championship team with mediocre players, the most talented marketing team cannot craft enough compelling messaging to differentiate a fundamentally undifferentiated product.

He walked me through product enhancement ideas designed to give their solution the uniqueness critical to market success, but also mentioned feeling somewhat envious of my position at IT Agent (formerly TrackD)—and I'll explain why shortly.

The Challenge of Authentic Differentiation

IT Agent represents my third startup in approximately six years. After each exit, I've been fortunate to speak with multiple early-stage companies seeking marketing expertise. Through these conversations, I've learned to quickly identify organizations hoping marketing can magically differentiate their products, whether they recognize this expectation or not.

My opening question in initial interviews always addresses market differentiation in crowded spaces—and every market feels crowded today. When I hear responses like "we're better, faster, easier to use, less expensive, provide superior support, or are more customer-centric," I know it's time to move on.

These aren't differentiators—they're table stakes that every competitor claims.

The Principle of Being Different vs. Better

This brings us back to my colleague's envy regarding my role at IT Agent. While it's unusual to reference a book from the Reagan Administration, William Davidow's 1986 work "Marketing High Technology" contains timeless principles I reference regularly. My favorite insight: in high technology, it's better to be significantly different than marginally better.

Simply put, if your competitor's product offers 100 features and you're banking on having 105 to win, you're facing a coin flip at best. In marketing, we have a term for ties: losses.

IT Agent's Fundamental Differentiation

I'm pleased to report that at IT Agent, this isn't my challenge. Mike Starr, our founder and CEO, addressed differentiation from day one—first pitch deck slide, first prototype. No one else is solving the problem we're tackling. As an enthusiastic visitor to our booth at last week's FutureCon event near Washington, D.C., exclaimed: "I can't believe no one's thought of this before."

Today we officially begin sharing with the cybersecurity community how we're leveraging crowdsourced intelligence to address the primary reason vulnerability remediation teams avoid aggressive patching: fear of operational disruption.

Addressing Industry Skepticism

We've encountered various responses to our approach. Some suggest it will be too difficult. Others claim it's overly complex. A few have even declared it impossible.

However, no one has told us that someone else is already doing it.

The Innovation Gap in Vulnerability Management

If you're a vulnerability remediation professional or cybersecurity practitioner who understands that rapid patch deployment represents the most effective method for reducing enterprise cyber risk, and if you're frustrated by the lack of meaningful innovation in the remediation space over the past decade, I can confidently state that we genuinely ARE different.

Our platform doesn't just claim to be better—it solves a problem that others haven't even acknowledged exists. We're not competing on features or performance metrics; we're creating an entirely new category of cybersecurity solution.

The Crowdsourced Intelligence Revolution

IT Agent's approach leverages collective intelligence from thousands of patch deployments to provide unprecedented visibility into patch safety profiles. Rather than treating all patches as equally risky, our platform enables informed decision-making based on real-world deployment data.

This represents more than incremental improvement—it's a paradigm shift from fear-based patching to confidence-driven vulnerability management.

Beyond Marketing Claims

While we could certainly discuss how our platform performs better than alternatives, that conversation belongs to another day. Today's message focuses on something more fundamental: the difference between solving known problems slightly better and solving overlooked problems entirely.

The cybersecurity industry produces countless solutions that promise faster detection, easier management, or lower costs. These incremental improvements have their place, but they don't address the core behavioral and cultural challenges that prevent effective vulnerability management.

The Future of Differentiated Security Solutions

IT Agent's success will ultimately be measured not by how we compare to existing solutions, but by how we enable organizations to achieve security outcomes previously impossible. When you solve problems others haven't recognized, comparison becomes irrelevant.

This approach requires more courage than creating another "better" solution, but it also offers the potential for transformational impact rather than marginal improvement.

For cybersecurity professionals seeking genuine innovation rather than incremental enhancement, the opportunity to be part of something truly different—not just marginally better—represents both a rare privilege and a significant responsibility.